+
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson's disease risk loci

Nature Genetics volume 49, pages 1511–1516 (2017)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Common variant genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have, to date, identified >24 risk loci for Parkinson's disease (PD). To discover additional loci, we carried out a GWAS comparing 6,476 PD cases with 302,042 controls, followed by a meta-analysis with a recent study of over 13,000 PD cases and 95,000 controls at 9,830 overlapping variants. We then tested 35 loci (P < 1 × 10−6) in a replication cohort of 5,851 cases and 5,866 controls. We identified 17 novel risk loci (P < 5 × 10−8) in a joint analysis of 26,035 cases and 403,190 controls. We used a neurocentric strategy to assign candidate risk genes to the loci. We identified protein-altering or cis–expression quantitative trait locus (cis-eQTL) variants in linkage disequilibrium with the index variant in 29 of the 41 PD loci. These results indicate a key role for autophagy and lysosomal biology in PD risk, and suggest potential new drug targets for PD.

Access through your institution
Buy or subscribe

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Access through your institution

Buy this article

  • Purchase on SpringerLink
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: A flow chart of the two-stage meta-analysis design.
Figure 2: Results of the Parkinson's disease discovery-phase meta-analysis.
Figure 3: The candidate genes for regions associated with Parkinson's disease.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Corti, O., Lesage, S. & Brice, A. What genetics tells us about the causes and mechanisms of Parkinson's disease. Physiol. Rev. 91, 1161–1218 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Verstraeten, A., Theuns, J. & Van Broeckhoven, C. Progress in unraveling the genetic etiology of Parkinson disease in a genomic era. Trends Genet. 31, 140–149 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nussbaum, R.L. & Ellis, C.E. Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 348, 1356–1364 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Shulman, J.M., De Jager, P.L. & Feany, M.B. Parkinson's disease: genetics and pathogenesis. Annu. Rev. Pathol. 6, 193–222 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klein, C. & Westenberger, A. Genetics of Parkinson's disease. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2, a008888 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hardy, J. Genetic analysis of pathways to Parkinson disease. Neuron 68, 201–206 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Singleton, A.B., Farrer, M.J. & Bonifati, V. The genetics of Parkinson's disease: progress and therapeutic implications. Mov. Disord. 28, 14–23 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nalls, M.A. et al. Large-scale meta-analysis of genome-wide association data identifies six new risk loci for Parkinson's disease. Nat. Genet. 46, 989–993 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Keller, M.F. et al. Using genome-wide complex trait analysis to quantify 'missing heritability' in Parkinson's disease. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 4996–5009 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Do, C.B. et al. Web-based genome-wide association study identifies two novel loci and a substantial genetic component for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002141 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fuchsberger, C., Abecasis, G.R. & Hinds, D.A. minimac2: faster genotype imputation. Bioinformatics 31, 782–784 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abecasis, G.R. et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 491, 56–65 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gagliano, S.A. et al. Genomics implicates adaptive and innate immunity in Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 3, 924–933 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Willer, C.J., Li, Y. & Abecasis, G.R. METAL: fast and efficient meta-analysis of genomewide association scans. Bioinformatics 26, 2190–2191 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Welter, D. et al. The NHGRI GWAS Catalog, a curated resource of SNP-trait associations. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D1001–D1006 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pickrell, J.K. et al. Detection and interpretation of shared genetic influences on 42 human traits. Nat. Genet. 48, 709–717 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nalls, M.A. et al. NeuroX, a fast and efficient genotyping platform for investigation of neurodegenerative diseases. Neurobiol. Aging 36, 1605.e7–1605.e12 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nalls, M.A. et al. Imputation of sequence variants for identification of genetic risks for Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Lancet 377, 641–649 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  19. International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium & Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 2. A two-stage meta-analysis identifies several new loci for Parkinson's disease. PLoS Genet. 7, e1002142 (2011).

  20. Pankratz, N. et al. Meta-analysis of Parkinson's disease: identification of a novel locus, RIT2. Ann. Neurol. 71, 370–384 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wissemann, W.T. et al. Association of Parkinson disease with structural and regulatory variants in the HLA region. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 93, 984–993 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sekar, A. et al. Schizophrenia risk from complex variation of complement component 4. Nature 530, 177–183 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kichaev, G. et al. Integrating functional data to prioritize causal variants in statistical fine-mapping studies. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004722 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Maller, J.B. et al. Bayesian refinement of association signals for 14 loci in 3 common diseases. Nat. Genet. 44, 1294–1301 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen, W. et al. Fine mapping causal variants with an approximate Bayesian method using marginal test statistics. Genetics 200, 719–736 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Okada, Y. et al. Genetics of rheumatoid arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature 506, 376–381 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bentham, J. et al. Genetic association analyses implicate aberrant regulation of innate and adaptive immunity genes in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Genet. 47, 1457–1464 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  28. GTEx Consortium. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science 348, 648–660 (2015).

  29. Zhang, Y. et al. An RNA-sequencing transcriptome and splicing database of glia, neurons, and vascular cells of the cerebral cortex. J. Neurosci. 34, 11929–11947 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Giambartolomei, C. et al. Bayesian test for colocalisation between pairs of genetic association studies using summary statistics. PLoS Genet. 10, e1004383 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sidransky, E. et al. Multicenter analysis of glucocerebrosidase mutations in Parkinson's disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 361, 1651–1661 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cang, C., Aranda, K., Seo, Y.J., Gasnier, B. & Ren, D. TMEM175 is an organelle K+ channel regulating lysosomal function. Cell 162, 1101–1112 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Felbor, U. et al. Neuronal loss and brain atrophy in mice lacking cathepsins B and L. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 7883–7888 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. McGlinchey, R.P. & Lee, J.C. Cysteine cathepsins are essential in lysosomal degradation of α-synuclein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 9322–9327 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hale, C.M. et al. Identification of modulators of autophagic flux in an image-based high content siRNA screen. Autophagy 12, 713–726 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, P.H., O'Dushlaine, C., Thomas, B. & Purcell, S.M. INRICH: interval-based enrichment analysis for genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 28, 1797–1799 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arranz, A.M. et al. LRRK2 functions in synaptic vesicle endocytosis through a kinase-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Sci. 128, 541–552 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shin, D., Shin, J.Y., McManus, M.T., Ptácek, L.J. & Fu, Y.H. Dicer ablation in oligodendrocytes provokes neuronal impairment in mice. Ann. Neurol. 66, 843–857 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tan, N.N. et al. Epigenetic downregulation of Scn3a expression by valproate: a possible role in its anticonvulsant activity. Mol. Neurobiol. 54, 2831–2842 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  40. Dittmer, S. et al. TOX3 is a neuronal survival factor that induces transcription depending on the presence of CITED1 or phosphorylated CREB in the transcriptionally active complex. J. Cell Sci. 124, 252–260 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kondo, M. et al. SATB1 plays a critical role in establishment of immune tolerance. J. Immunol. 196, 563–572 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Hopkins, A.L. & Groom, C.R. The druggable genome. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 1, 727–730 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Louis, A.G., Yel, L., Cao, J.N., Agrawal, S. & Gupta, S. Common variable immunodeficiency associated with microdeletion of chromosome 1q42.1-q42.3 and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate kinase B (ITPKB) deficiency. Clin. Transl. Immunology 5, e59 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wang, Y. et al. Whole-genome association study identifies STK39 as a hypertension susceptibility gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 226–231 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Durand, E.Y., Do, C.B., Mountain, J.L. & Macpherson, J.M. Ancestry composition: a novel, efficient pipeline for ancestry deconvolution. bioRxiv Preprint at http://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2014/10/18/010512 (2014).

  46. Henn, B.M. et al. Cryptic distant relatives are common in both isolated and cosmopolitan genetic samples. PLoS One 7, e34267 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  47. Howie, B., Fuchsberger, C., Stephens, M., Marchini, J. & Abecasis, G.R. Fast and accurate genotype imputation in genome-wide association studies through pre-phasing. Nat. Genet. 44, 955–959 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  48. de Bakker, P.I. et al. Practical aspects of imputation-driven meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17, R122–R128 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  49. Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bulik-Sullivan, B.K. et al. LD score regression distinguishes confounding from polygenicity in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet. 47, 291–295 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  51. Finucane, H.K. et al. Partitioning heritability by functional annotation using genome-wide association summary statistics. Nat. Genet. 47, 1228–1235 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  52. Lee, S.H., Yang, J., Goddard, M.E., Visscher, P.M. & Wray, N.R. Estimation of pleiotropy between complex diseases using single-nucleotide polymorphism-derived genomic relationships and restricted maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics 28, 2540–2542 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  53. Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly (Austin) 6, 80–92 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  54. dos Santos, G. et al. FlyBase: introduction of the Drosophila melanogaster Release 6 reference genome assembly and large-scale migration of genome annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D690–D697 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  55. Eppig, J.T., Blake, J.A., Bult, C.J., Kadin, J.A. & Richardson, J.E. The Mouse Genome Database (MGD): facilitating mouse as a model for human biology and disease. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D726–D736 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  56. McKusick, V.A. MENDELIAN Inheritance in Man and its online version, OMIM. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 80, 588–604 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Szklarczyk, D. et al. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D362–D368 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  58. Smith, A.C. & Robinson, A.J. MitoMiner v3.1, an update on the mitochondrial proteomics database. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1258–D1261 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Calvo, S.E., Clauser, K.R. & Mootha, V.K. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1251–D1257 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Pagliarini, D.J. et al. A mitochondrial protein compendium elucidates complex I disease biology. Cell 134, 112–123 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  61. Brozzi, A., Urbanelli, L., Germain, P.L., Magini, A. & Emiliani, C. hLGDB: a database of human lysosomal genes and their regulation. Database (Oxford) 2013, bat024 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  62. Moussay, E. et al. The acquisition of resistance to TNFα in breast cancer cells is associated with constitutive activation of autophagy as revealed by a transcriptome analysis using a custom microarray. Autophagy 7, 760–770 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Kanehisa, M. & Goto, S. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Gene Ontology Consortium. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D1049–D1056 (2015).

  65. Chang, C.C. et al. Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4, 7 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of the subjects who donated their time and biological samples to be a part of this study. Funding details and additional acknowledgments are provided in Supplementary Note 1.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir & Marcel van der Brug

    Present address: Amgen, South San Francisco, California, USA

  2. Tushar R Bhangale and Robert R Graham: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA

    Diana Chang, Julie Hunkapiller, Marcel van der Brug, Fang Cai, Geoffrey A Kerchner, Gai Ayalon, Baris Bingol, Morgan Sheng, Timothy W Behrens, Tushar R Bhangale & Robert R Graham

  2. Laboratory of Neurogenetics, National Institute on Aging, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

    Mike A Nalls & Andrew B Singleton

  3. Data Tecnica International, Glen Echo, Maryland, USA

    Mike A Nalls

  4. 23andMe Inc., Mountain View, California, USA

    Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir & David Hinds

  5. E-Scape Bio, South San Francisco, California, USA

    Marcel van der Brug

Authors
  1. Diana Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike A Nalls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ingileif B Hallgrímsdóttir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Julie Hunkapiller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marcel van der Brug
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  6. Fang Cai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  7. Geoffrey A Kerchner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  8. Gai Ayalon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  9. Baris Bingol
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  10. Morgan Sheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  11. David Hinds
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  12. Timothy W Behrens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  13. Andrew B Singleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  14. Tushar R Bhangale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  15. Robert R Graham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium

23andMe Research Team

Contributions

D.C., M.A.N., I.B.H., the 23andMe Research Team, G.A.K., B.B., M.S., D.H., T.W.B., A.B.S., T.R.B., and R.R.G. contributed to the study design. D.C., M.A.N., I.B.H., T.R.B., and D.H. contributed to analysis and methods. D.C., M.A.N., T.W.B., A.B.S., T.R.B., and R.R.G. wrote the manuscript. D.C., M.A.N., I.B.H., J.H., M.v.d.B., F.C., the International Parkinson's Disease Genomics Consortium (IPDGC), the 23andMe Research Team, G.A.K., G.A., B.B., M.S., D.H., T.W.B., A.B.S., T.R.B., and R.R.G. reviewed the manuscript. M.v.d.B., F.C., IPDGC and the 23andMe Research Team provided samples or data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert R Graham.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

D.C., J.H., F.C., G.A.K., G.A., B.B., M.S., T.W.B., T.R.B., and R.R.G. are employees of Genentech, a member of the Roche group. M.v.d.B. was employed by Genentech when the study was carried out. I.B.H. was employed by 23andMe Inc. when the study was carried out. Members of the 23andMe Research Team and D.H. are employees of 23andMe Inc. M.A.N. also consults for Illumina Inc., the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and University of California Healthcare.

Additional information

A list of members appears in Supplementary Note 1.

A list of members appears in Supplementary Note 1.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Text and Figures

Supplementary Note 1, Supplementary Figures 1–7, Supplementary Tables 2, 3, 7, 8, 11 (PDF 4728 kb)

Life Sciences Reporting Summary (PDF 129 kb)

Supplementary Table 1

Enrichment statistics for PD heritability across 24 annotations. (XLSX 53 kb)

Supplementary Table 4

Candidate PD associations with P < 1 × 10−6 in the discovery meta-analysis (XLSX 36 kb)

Supplementary Table 5: NeuroX and joint meta-analysis association statistics for loci with P < 1 × 10−6 in the discovery meta-analysis

Grayed out rows represent weaker proxies that were not included in the main manuscript. No suitable proxies were available for rs62333164 and rs4657041. (XLSX 41 kb)

Supplementary Table 6

Variants with regulomeDB scores > 3 that are in LD with novel PD-associated index SNPs (XLSX 46 kb)

Supplementary Table 9: Cis-eQTLs for PD-associated loci

For PD associated regions with significant cis-eQTLs (as displayed in Figure 3), the brain and nonbrain tissue with the most significant p-value is listed for each PD loci. “Risk expression” considers the direction of expression the risk allele is associated with. (XLSX 44 kb)

Supplementary Table 10

Genes within 250 kb of PD-associated loci with evidence of coexpression and/or protein–protein interactions (XLSX 46 kb)

Supplementary Table 12

General gene-set enrichment analysis of PD associations (XLSX 343 kb)

Supplementary Table 13

All protein-coding genes within 250 kb of PD-associated loci used as input for STRING analysis (XLSX 34 kb)

Supplementary Table 14

Minimum P values for the 42 genes in the lysosomal pathway for which SNPs tested in this meta-analysis were within 250 kb (XLSX 43 kb)

Supplementary Table 15

Minimum P values for 117 genes in the mitochondrial pathway for which SNPs tested in this meta-analysis were within 250 kb. (XLSX 45 kb)

Supplementary Table 16

Minimum P values for 25 genes in the autophagy pathway for which SNPs tested in this meta-analysis were within 250 kb. (XLSX 41 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chang, D., Nalls, M., Hallgrímsdóttir, I. et al. A meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies identifies 17 new Parkinson's disease risk loci. Nat Genet 49, 1511–1516 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3955

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3955

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务，不要输入任何密码和下载