+
Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization method of C2 system architecture based on ALCARO

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To address the lack of combat mission-driven and guided optimization methods in existing command and control (C2) system architectures, this paper proposes an optimization method for C2 system architecture based on an improved artificial rabbit optimization (ARO) algorithm, specifically the adaptive inertia weight, Levy flight, and chaotic opposite-based learning in artificial rabbit optimization (ALCARO). This method introduces a collaborative connection degree for C2 system architectures, quantitatively describing the degree of collaboration between combat units and same-level C2 units, and establishes a mathematical model for the optimization problem of C2 system architecture. The ALCARO algorithm innovatively incorporates adaptive inertia weight, Levy flight, and piecewise chaotic mapping-based opposite learning strategies to enhance the algorithm's convergence speed, effectively avoiding premature convergence to local optima and demonstrating robust performance. Simulation results show that this method can effectively enhance the connectivity among collaborative combat units in a mission-oriented manner and possesses excellent invulnerability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

References

  1. Yuan F (2023) Network centric warfare and command and control system analysis. Electron Compon Inf Technol 7(12):183–186

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang JR, Wang G, Wang SY (2021) Research on the architecture of air and missile defense of tactics-level command and control system. Fire Control Command Control 46(1):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang YL, Dai ZJ, Zhang LF et al (2020) Application of artificial intelligence in military: from projects view. In: 2020 6th International Conference on Big Data and Information Analytics (BigDIA), IEEE, pp 113–116

  4. Schubert J, Brynielsson J, Nilsson M et al (2018) Artificial intelligence for decision support in command and control systems. In: 23rd International Command and Control Research & Technology Symposium “Multi-Domain C2”, pp 18–33

  5. Cui J, Rao S (2021) US Army big data military applications and reflections. In: 2021 3rd International Conference on Big-data Service and Intelligent Computation, pp 92–96

  6. Jones MA, Leon JD (2020) Multi-domain operations. Three Swords Mag 36:38–41

    Google Scholar 

  7. Magnuson S (2018) DARPA pushes ‘Mosaic Warfare’ concept. National Defense 103(780):18–19

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen C (2018) Research on Agile C2 oriented architecture for command and control system. National University of Defense Technology

  9. Huang DG, Zhang YX, Lin HM et al (2020) Classification model based on rule-based reasoning network. J Softw 31(4):1063–1078

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu ZP, Xie XW (2009) Consensus convergence rate of multi-agent systems in regular networks. J Yangtze Univ (Natural Science Edition) 6(2):60–62

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erdős P, Rényi A (1959) On random graphs. Publications Mathematicae 6:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Erdős P, Rényi A (1961) On the strength of connectedness of a random graph. Acta Math Hungar 12(1):261–267

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dj W (1998) Collective dynamics of ’small-world’ networks. Nature 393(6684):409–410

    Google Scholar 

  14. Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509–512

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilbert EN (1959) Random graphs. Ann Math Stat 30(4):1141–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabási AL (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(6794):378–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Crucitti P, Latora V, Marchiori M et al (2004) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Physica A 340(1–3):388–394

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Si GY, Wang YZ, Li RJ, Wang F (2015) Modeling C2 system-of-systems based on networks. J Command Control 1(1):19–24

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li TD, Wang G, Guo XK et al (2024) Topological characteristics of air defense and antimissile system based on complex network. Firepower Command Control 49(7):30–35

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan CS, Xiong W, Qiu SM et al (2018) Research on multi-attribute weighted command and control network modeling method. Modern Defense Technol 46(4):60–66

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hildmann H, Atia DY, Ruta D et al (2017) A model for wireless-access network topology and a PSO-based approach for its optimization. Recent Adv Comput Opt: Res Workshop Comput Opt WCO 2018:87–116

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sun CY, Shen MX, Sheng H et al (2017) Invulnerability optimization design of air defense multi-sensor network structure. J Commun 38(6):118–126

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sabino SE, Grilo AM (2022) NSGA-II based joint topology and routing optimization of flying backhaul networks. IEEE Access 10:96180–96196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Wang Y, Yan MD et al (2022) Optimization of close air support super-network structure based on heuristic genetic algorithm. Ordnance Equipment Eng 43(6):121–127

    Google Scholar 

  25. Victer SR (2020) Connectivity knowledge and the degree of structural formalization: a contribution to a contingency theory of organizational capability. J Organ Des 9(2/3):929–958

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang Z (2022) Research on force collaboration methods in mosaic warfare based on crowdsourcing. University of Defense Technology

  27. Sun Y, Yao PY, Wu JX et al (2016) Design method of flat command and control structure of force organization. Syst Eng Electronic Technol 38(8):1833–1839

    Google Scholar 

  28. Chen XL (2021) Research on the evaluation of command element allocation scheme for command relationship adjustment. Nanjing University of Science and Technology

  29. Wang JW, Pan CS (2024) Research on construction method of command and control network model based on complex network theory. IET Control Theory Appl Appl. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1049/cth2.12756.

  30. Kong Z, Yang Q, Zhao J et al (2020) Adaptive adjustment of weights and search strategies-based whale optimization algorithm. J Northeastern Univ (Natural Science) 41(1):35

    Google Scholar 

  31. Francis B, Christophe P (2024) The statistics of Rayleigh-Levy flight extrema. Astron Astrophys 689

  32. Long W, Jiao J, Liang X et al (2019) A random opposition-based learning grey wolf optimizer. IEEE Access 7:113810–113825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhou F, Liu Z, Wu L (2013) Intelligent command and control system. National Defense Industry Press, pp 74–78

  34. Shehadeh HA (2023) Chernobyl disaster optimizer (CDO): a novel meta-heuristic method for global optimization. Neural Comput Appl 35(15):10733–10749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dehghani M, Trojovský P (2023) Osprey optimization algorithm: a new bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithm for solving engineering optimization problems. Front Mech Eng 8:1126450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Key Project: Space-Earth Integration Intelligent Network Traffic Theory and Key Technology Fund Project (61931004).

Funding

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, 61931004, 61931004.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jianwei Wang’s contribution is methodology, software, validation, data curation, writing—original draft, project administration, and visualization. Qing Zhang’s contribution is formal analysis, investigation, and writing—review and editing Chengsheng Pan’s contribution is conceptualization, resources, supervision, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian-wei Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Jw., Zhang, Q. & Pan, Cs. Optimization method of C2 system architecture based on ALCARO. J Supercomput 81, 330 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06768-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-06768-5

Keywords

点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载