Abstract
The development of online payment service enables the charging options for knowledge sharing, and morphs the social Q&A platforms into the knowledge exchange market. In the emerging trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms, the asker needs to offer a certain amount of consulting fees to the answerer, and may also get monetary reward by the listeners’ accumulated micro-payments. Thus, the asker’s pay intention is one of the distinctive characteristics compared with the traditional Q&A model. This preliminary paper aims at exploring the influence factors that trigger askers’ pay intention, by integrating the social exchange theory and social capital theory into examining the emerging style of trilateral payment-based social Q&A platforms.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cheng, M.: Sharing economy: a review and agenda for future research. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 57, 60–70 (2016)
Choi, E., Shah, C.: User motivations for asking questions in online Q&A services. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 67(5), 1182–1197 (2016)
Wilson, T.D.: On user studies and information needs. J. Doc. 37(1), 3–15 (1981)
Zhang, Y.: Contextualizing consumer health information searching: an analysis of questions in a social Q&A community. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Health Informatics Symposium, pp. 210–219, Virginia, Arlington (2010)
Morris, M.R., Teevan, J., Panovich, K.: What do people ask their social networks, and why?: a survey study of status message Q&A behavior. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1739–1748, Georgia, Atlanta (2010)
Zeithaml, V.A.: Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. J. Mark. 52(3), 2–22 (1988)
Kim, H.W., Xu, Y., Gupta, S.: Which is more important in Internet shopping, perceived price or trust? Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 11(3), 241–252 (2012)
Kwon, H.H., Trail, G., James, J.D.: The mediating role of perceived value: team identification and purchase intention of team-licensed apparel. J. Sport Manag. 21(4), 540–554 (2007)
Chen, Y., Ho, T.H., Kim, Y.M.: Knowledge market design: a field experiment at Google Answers. J. Public Econ. Theory 12(4), 641–664 (2010)
Homans, G.C.: Social behavior as exchange. Am. J. Sociol. 63(6), 597–606 (1958)
Kankanhalli, A., Tan, B.C., Wei, K.K.: Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: an empirical investigation. MIS Q. 29(1), 113–143 (2005)
Chu, C.W., Lu, H.P.: Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan: an empirical study based on the value-intention framework. Internet Res. 17(2), 139–155 (2007)
Hau, Y.S., Kim, B., Lee, H., Kim, Y.G.: The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 33(2), 356–366 (2013)
Ye, H.J., Kankanhalli, A.: Solvers’ participation in crowdsourcing platforms: examining the impacts of trust, and benefit and cost factors. J. Strateg. Inf. Syst. 26(2), 101–117 (2017)
Lin, X., Zhang, D., Li, Y.: Delineating the dimensions of social support on social networking sites and their effects: a comparative model. Comput. Hum. Behav. 58, 421–430 (2016)
Liang, T.P., Ho, Y.T., Li, Y.W., Turban, E.: What drives social commerce: the role of social support and relationship quality. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 16(2), 69–90 (2011)
Lin, H.F.: Determinants of successful virtual communities: contributions from system characteristics and social factors. Inf. Manag. 45(8), 522–527 (2008)
Chang, S.E., Shen, W.C., Liu, A.Y.: Why mobile users trust smartphone social networking services? A PLS-SEM approach. J. Bus. Res. 69(11), 4890–4895 (2016)
Ifinedo, P.: Applying uses and gratifications theory and social influence processes to understand students’ pervasive adoption of social networking sites: perspectives from the Americas. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 36(2), 192–206 (2016)
Umphress, E.E., Bingham, J.B., Mitchell, M.S.: Unethical behavior in the name of the company: the moderating effect of organizational identification and positive reciprocity beliefs on unethical pro-organizational behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 95(4), 769–780 (2010)
Park, J.G., Lee, J.: Knowledge sharing in information systems development projects: explicating the role of dependence and trust. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32(1), 153–165 (2014)
Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Wang, B., Chau, P.Y., Zhang, L.: Cultivating the sense of belonging and motivating user participation in virtual communities: a social capital perspective. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 32(6), 574–588 (2012)
Chang, H.H., Wong, K.H.: Adoption of e-procurement and participation of e-marketplace on firm performance: trust as a moderator. Inf. Manag. 47(5), 262–270 (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this paper
Cite this paper
Zhao, Y., Liu, Z., Song, S. (2018). Why Should I Pay for the Knowledge in Social Q&A Platforms?. In: Chowdhury, G., McLeod, J., Gillet, V., Willett, P. (eds) Transforming Digital Worlds. iConference 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10766. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_64
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78105-1_64
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-78104-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-78105-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)