Abstract
Worldwide, approximately 50 million people live with Alzheimer’s disease or other dementias and there are nearly 10 million new cases every year. Social robots have been a promising approach to supplement human caregivers in dementia care. In this narrative review, we reviewed 62 articles to gain insight into the attitudes and perceptions among people with dementia and other stakeholders worldwide towards using social robots to assist dementia care. Then, we discussed some critical factors and challenges found in these studies influencing people’s perceptions as well as future directions in this field. The primary influencing challenges include cultural factors, users’ limited experiences with technologies, methodological challenges underlying qualitative studies as well as technological malfunctions in current robot system. We further suggested several aspects to be taken into more consideration in future research, including collaborations with other stakeholders, design of individual or group use for dementia care, an adaptive level of autonomy in a social robot and long-term human-robot interaction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Appel, L., Peisachovich, E., Sinclair, D., Jokel, R., Da Silva, C.: SafeHome: a serious game to promote safe environments for persons living with dementia. Cureus 12(2), e6949 (2020)
Arthanat, S., Begum, M., Gu, T., LaRoche, D.P., Xu, D., Zhang, N.: Caregiver perspectives on a smart home-based socially assistive robot for individuals with Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, pp. 789–798 (2020)
Aymerich-Franch, L.: Why it is time to stop ostracizing social robots. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2(7), 364 (2020)
Bartl, A., Bosch, S., Brandt, M., Dittrich, M., Lugrin, B.: The influence of a social robot’s persona on how it is perceived and accepted by elderly users. In: International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 681–691. Social Robotics, Kansas (2016)
Boumans, R.J.: Feasibility and Effectiveness of Social Robots in Acquiring Patient Reported Outcomes from Older Adults, p. 231. Radboud University (2020)
Cavallo, F., et al.: Robotic services acceptance in smart environments with older adults: user satisfaction and acceptability study. J. Med. Int. Res. 20(9), e264 (2018)
Cesta, A., Cortellessa, G., Orlandini, A., Tiberio, L.: Long-term evaluation of a telepresence robot for the elderly: methodology and ecological case study. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 8(3), 421–441 (2016)
Chen, L.-Y., Sumioka, H., Ke, L.-J., Shiomi, M., Chen, L.-K.: Effects of teleoperated humanoid robot application in older adults with neurocognitive disorders in Taiwan: a report of three cases. Aging Med. Healthc. 11(2), 67–71 (2020)
Coco, K., Kangasniemi, M., Rantanen, T.: Care personnel’s attitudes and fears toward care robots in elderly care: a comparison of data from the care personnel in Finland and Japan. J. Nurs. Scholarship 50(6), 634–644 (2018)
Coşar, S., et al.: ENRICHME: perception and interaction of an assistive robot for the elderly at home. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(3), 779–805 (2020)
Damholdt, M., et al.: Attitudinal change in elderly citizens toward social robots: the role of personality traits and beliefs about robot functionality. Front. Psychol. (2015). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01701
Di Nuovo, A., et al.: The multi-modal interface of Robot-Era multi-robot services tailored for the elderly. Intel. Serv. Robot. 11(1), 109–126 (2017)
Do, H.M., Sheng, W., Harrington, E.E., Bishop, A.J.: Clinical screening interview using a social robot for geriatric care. IEEE Trans. Automat. Sci. Eng. 18(3), 1229–1242 (2021)
Doi, T., Kuwahara, N., Morimoto, K.: Questionnaire survey result of the use of communication robots for recreational activities at nursing homes. In: Chung, W.J., Shin, C.S. (eds.) Advances in Affective and Pleasurable Design, pp. 3–13. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41661-8_1
D’Onofio, G., et al.: MARIO project: a multicenter survey about companion robot acceptability in caregivers of patients with dementia. Italian Forum of Ambient Assisted Living, Genova (2017)
Faucounau, V., Ya-Huei, W., Boulay, M., Maestrutti, M., Rigaud, A.-S.: Caregivers’ requirements for in-home robotic agent for supporting community-living elderly subjects with cognitive impairment. Technol. Health Care 17(1), 33–40 (2009)
Feng, Z., et al.: Long-term care system for older adults in China: policy landscape, challenges, and future prospects. The Lancet 396(10259), 1362–1372 (2020)
Griese, S.: A robot for the elderly? A qualitative research on the acceptance of NAO robots in elderly care. Maastricht University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience (2015)
Hanson, S.T., Anderson, H.J., Bak, T.: Practical evaluation of robots for elderly in Denmark — an overview. In: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). IEEE, Osaka (2010)
Harmo, P., Taipalus, T., Knuuttila, J., Vallet, J., Halme, A.: Needs and Solutions - Home Automation and Service Robots for the Elderly and Disabled. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Edmonton (2005)
Heerink, M.B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 361–375 (2010)
Heernik, M., Krose, B.J., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.J.: Studying the acceptance of a robotic agent by elderly users. Int. J. Model. Ident. Control 33–43 (2006)
Johansson-Pajala, R.-M., et al.: Care robot orientation: what, who and how? Potential users’ perceptions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(5), 1103–1117 (2020)
Kazuko, O., Naonori, K., Shigeru, M.: Can connected technologies improve sleep quality and safety of older adults and caregivers? An evaluation study of sleep monitors and communicative robots at a residential care home in Japan. In: Technology in Society (2020)
Ke, C., Lou, V.W.-Q., Tan, K.C.-K., Wai, M.Y., Chan, L.L.: Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: the role of social robot engagement. Int. J. Med. Inf. 141, 104241 (2020)
Khosla, R., Nguyen, K., Chu, M.-T.: Human robot engagement and acceptability in residential aged care. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 33(6), 510–522 (2017)
Kim, G., Jeon, H., Park, S., Choi, Y., Lim, Y.: Care guide system for caregivers of people with dementia*. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology (EMBC). IEEE, Montreal (2020)
Koceski, S., Koceska, N.: Evaluation of an assistive telepresence robot for elderly healthcare. J. Med. Syst. 40(5), 1–7 (2016)
Korchut, A., et al.: Challenges for service robots—requirements of elderly adults with cognitive impairments. Front. Neurol. Neurodegen. (2017)
Law, M., et al.: Developing assistive robots for people with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia: a qualitative study with older adults and experts in aged care. BMJ Open 9(9), e031937 (2019)
Lin, X., Saksono, H., Stowell, E., Lachman, M.E., Castaneda-Sceppa, C., Parker, A.G.: Go&Grow: an evaluation of a pervasive social exergame for caregivers of loved ones with dementia. ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery (2020)
Łukasik, S., Tobis, S., Kropińska, S., Suwalska, A.: Role of assistive robots in the care of older people: survey study among medical and nursing students. J. Med. Internet Res. 22(8), e18003 (2020)
Manca, M., et al.: The impact of serious games with humanoid robots on mild cognitive impairment older adults. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 145, 102509 (2021)
Manca, M., et al.: The impact of serious games with humanoid robots on mild cognitive impairment older adults. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. (2020)
Mast, M., et al.: User-centered design of a dynamic-autonomy remote interaction concept for manipulation-capable robots to assist elderly people in the home. J. Human-Robot Interact. (2012)
Mucchiani, C., Cacchione, P., Torres, W., Johnson, M.J., Yim, M.: Exploring low-cost mobile manipulation for elder care within a community based setting. J. Intell. Rob. Syst. 98(1), 59–70 (2019)
Nomura, T., Kanda, T., Suzuki, T., Kato, K.: Age differences and images of robots: social survey in Japan. Interact. Stud. Soc. Behav. Commun. Biol. Artif. Syst. 10(3), 374–391 (2009)
Papadopoulos, C., et al.: The CARESSES study protocol: testing and evaluating culturally competent socially assistive robots among older adults residing in long term care homes through a controlled experimental trial. Archiv. Publ. Health (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-020-00409-y
Patterson, C.: World Alzheimer Report 2018. Alzheimer’s Disease International, London (2018)
Peterson, C.M., Mikal, J.P., McCarron, H.R., Finlay, J.M., Mitchell, L.L., Gaugler, J.E.: The feasibility and utility of a personal health record for persons with dementia and their family caregivers for web-based care coordination: mixed methods study. J. Med. Internet Res.: Aging (2020)
Pigini, L., Facal, D., Blasi, L., Andrich, R.: Service robots in elderly care at home: users’ needs and perceptions as a basis for concept development. Technol. Disabil. 24(4), 303–311 (2012)
Raghunath, N., Pereyda, C., Frow, J.F., Cook, D., Schmitter-Edgecomb, M.: Learning-enabled robotic assistive support: understanding older adult opinions and comparing them to younger adult opinions. Gerontechnol. Int. J. Fundam. Aspect. Technol. Serve The Ageing Soc. 19(3) (2020)
Rico, F.M., Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., Clavero, J.G., Guerrero-Higueras, Á.M., Olivera, V.M.: An Acceptance Test for Assistive Robots. Human-Robot Interaction and Sensors for Social Robotics (2020).
Sadegh Khaksar, S.M., Jahanshahi, A.A., Slade, B.W., Asian, S.S.: A dual-factor theory of WTs adoption in aged care service operations -a cross-country analysis. Inf. Technol. People (2020)
Salichs, M.A., et al.: Mini: a new social robot for the elderly. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 12(6), 1231–1249 (2020)
Sarrica, M.S.: How many facets does a “social robot” have? A review of scientific and popular definitions online. Inf. Technol. People (2019)
Schüssler, S., et al.: The effects of a humanoid socially assistive robot versus tablet training on psychosocial and physical outcomes of persons with dementia: protocol for a mixed methods study. JMIR Res. Protoc. (2020)
Seifert, L.S., Kaelber, K., Flaherty, K., Bowman, T.: Experiences in Alzheimer’s disease: what do stakeholders post on the internet? J. Psych. Res. Cybersp.: Cyberpsychol. (2020)
Shibata, T.: Therapeutic seal robot as biofeedback medical device: qualitative and quantitative evaluations of robot therapy in dementia care. In: IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology, pp. 2527–2538. IEEE, Wuhan (2012)
Shibata, T., Wada, K.: Robot therapy: a new approach for mental healthcare of the elderly – a mini-review. Gerontology 57(4), 378–386 (2011)
Spalla, G., Gouin-Vallerand, C., Yaddaden, A., Bier, N.: Towards an augmented reality cognitive orthosis to assist people with Alzheimer’s disease: preliminary design. In: International Conference on Smart Objects and Technologies for Social Good, pp. 60–65 (2020)
Sriram, V., Jenkinson, C., Peters, M.: Carers’ experiences of assistive technology use in dementia care: a cross sectional survey (in review). BMC Geriatrics (2020)
Suwa, S., et al.: Home-care professionals’ ethical perceptions of the development and use of home-care robots for older adults in Japan. Int. J. Human–Comput. Interact. 36(14), 1295–1303 (2020)
Suwa, S., et al.: Exploring perceptions toward home-care robots for older people in Finland, Ireland, and Japan: a comparative questionnaire study. Archiv. Gerontol. Geriatr. 91, 104178 (2020)
Torta, E., et al.: Evaluation of a small socially-assistive humanoid robot in intelligent homes for the care of the elderly. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 76(1), 57–71 (2014)
Tsujimura, M., et al.: The essential needs for home-care robots in Japan. J. Enabl. Technol. 14(4), 201–220 (2020)
Valentí Soler, M., et al.: Social robots in advanced dementia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 7, 133 (2015)
van Kemenade, M.: Moral Concerns of Caregivers about Social Robots in Eldercare, p. 161. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2020)
von der Pütten, A.M., Krämer, N.C.: A survey on robot appearances. In: 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 267–268. IEEE (2012)
Whelan, S., Murphy, K., Barrett, E., Krusche, C., Santorelli, A., Casey, D.: Factors affecting the acceptability of social robots by older adults including people with dementia or cognitive impairment: a literature review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 10(5), 643–668 (2018)
Wilson, G., et al.: Robot-Enabled Support of Daily Activities in Smart Home Environments. Cognit. Syst. Res. (2018)
Wu, Y.-H., Fassert, C., Rigaud, A.-S.: Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Archiv. Gerontol. Geriatr. 54(1), 121–126 (2012)
Yuan, F., et al.: Assessing the acceptability of a humanoid robot for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia care using an online survey (2021). https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.12903
Yuan, F., Klavon, E., Liu, Z., Lopez, R.P., Zhao, X.: A systematic review of robotic rehabilitation for cognitive training. Front. Robot. AI 8, 105 (2021)
Zhang, Y., Chignell, M.H.: Flattening the curve of cognitive decline: a survey of cognitive interventions for people living with dementia (a review). In: International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, pp. 110–114. Sage Journals, London (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Woods, D., Yuan, F., Jao, YL., Zhao, X. (2021). Social Robots for Older Adults with Dementia: A Narrative Review on Challenges & Future Directions. In: Li, H., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13086. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90525-5_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90524-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90525-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)