+
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Sustainability and energy consumption of farm-free cellular agriculture

Cellular agriculture is emerging as a new approach to the production of food ingredients, offering an alternative to conventional agricultural practices. This Comment highlights critical sustainability considerations and examines the energy efficiency of biotechnologically produced cellular crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of the environmental sustainability, efficiency and scalability of convention livestock products versus farm-free cellular products.

References

  1. Schramski, J. R., Woodson, C. B. & Brown, J. H. Energy use and the sustainability of intensifying food production. Nat. Sustain. 3, 257–259 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Searchinger, T., Waite, R., Hanson, C., Ranganathan, J. & Matthews, E. Creating a sustainable food future: a menu of solutions to feed nearly 10 billion people by 2050-synthesis report. World Resources Institute https://go.nature.com/43g6SzN (19 July 2019).

  3. El Wali, M., Rahimpour Golroudbary, S., Kraslawski, A. & Tuomisto, H. L. Transition to cellular agriculture reduces agriculture land use and greenhouse gas emissions but increases demand for critical materials. Commun. Earth Environ. 5, 61 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Steinwand, M. A. & Ronald, P. C. Crop biotechnology and the future of food. Nat. Food 1, 273–283 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yart, L. et al. Cellular agriculture for milk bioactive production. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 1, 858–874 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lark, T. J. et al. Environmental outcomes of the US renewable fuel standard. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2101084119 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sinke, P., Swartz, E., Sanctorum, H., Van Der Giesen, C. & Odegard, I. Ex-ante life cycle assessment of commercial-scale cultivated meat production in 2030. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 28, 234–254 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuomisto, H. L. Challenges of assessing the environmental sustainability of cellular agriculture. Nat. Food 3, 801–803 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mattick, C. S., Landis, A. E., Allenby, B. R. & Genovese, N. J. Anticipatory life cycle analysis of in vitro biomass cultivation for cultured meat production in the United States. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11941–11949 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pelton, R. E. et al. Greenhouse gas emissions in US beef production can be reduced by up to 30% with the adoption of selected mitigation measures. Nat. Food 5, 787–797 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Howard, P. H. Cellular agriculture will reinforce power asymmetries in food systems. Nat. Food 3, 798–800 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Broad, G. M. & Chiles, R. M. Thick and thin food justice approaches in the evaluation of cellular agriculture. Nat. Food 3, 795–797 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Willett, W. et al. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet 393, 447–492 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tuomisto, H. L. & Teixeira de Mattos, M. J. Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 6117–6123 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crippa, M. et al. Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nat. Food 2, 198–209 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

M.G. acknowledges Deakin University for its financial support through the Alfred Deakin Research Fellowship, which enabled the completion of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.G. conceptualized the study, coordinated the team, and wrote the first draft of the paper. M.D., J.C., A.F., C.J.B., M.Z., D.J.M. and B.A. contributed to writing and improving different sections of the paper. All authors contributed notably to the final version of the paper.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mehran Ghasemlou, Colin J. Barrow or Benu Adhikari.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghasemlou, M., Dokouhaki, M., Chandrapala, J. et al. Sustainability and energy consumption of farm-free cellular agriculture. Nat Rev Bioeng (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-025-00385-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44222-025-00385-4

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene
点击 这是indexloc提供的php浏览器服务,不要输入任何密码和下载