Fig. 2: Comparison of target contouring performance based on varying training dataset sizes. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Comparison of target contouring performance based on varying training dataset sizes.

From: LLM-driven multimodal target volume contouring in radiation oncology

Fig. 2

a Quantitative comparison for all the validation sets. The Dice metric for each trial is presented as mean values (center lines) with 95th percentile of confidence intervals calculated with the non-parametric bootstrap method (shaded areas). n denotes the number of patients. b Visual comparison for external validation #1. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

Back to article page