Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
Well, the second line on website is: But ultimately I think people just need to try it for themselves to feel the difference. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
Have you considered or benchmarked optimizing for speed instead of size? Using /O2 instead of /O1? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
I haven't and I don't have the bandwidth for it right now. If you feel like doing that and posting the results... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
You should add to the website that this reader is very fast, and has fast search. Compared to the free adobe acrobat (I don't know if the paid version is any better) this is way quicker. And acrobat is already faster than browser. I almost didn't download this, but now it's staying. Maybe some kind of benchmark would be good, because just saying fast and small is not enough in my opinion.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions