VirusTotal hit (1/71 vendors) #1193
Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
|
Please use the search function. I'm writing this for the third time, those are false positives and there is nothing we can do about it. Write the vendor of the faulty virus detection engine, they should check and fix it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
I apologize for bringing it up. Albeit it was not an exhaustive search, I did use the “Discussion” tab’s search feature and entered “virus”, and nothing came up indicating this was asked before. Now the only thing that comes up is my post. Thank you for your time. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
No worries, sorry for my slightly annoyed reaction. The others were reported as issues, therefore the discussion search couldn't find them. Now the good thing is, that the next person should be able to find an existing issue, no matter where they look 😉 I can recommend the repo wide search over the dedicated search fields. Github UX is not ideal here. https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Apdfarranger%2Fpdfarranger+virustotal&type=issues |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
It is a common issue, just stumbled upon this on the internet:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Hi, I'm just curious if any contributors would know why virus total has a 1/71 vendor detection for the pdfarranger executable on windows. SecureAge considered it to be malicious.
I'm sure the app is fine, but I am curious.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions