I'm really sorry for the noise, I'm just trying to understand this PR. With this change, the business rules are being modified, and we can now encounter situations like this:

where the community agrees on the genus but not on the species-level ID. I suppose all these texts would need to be updated as well, and maybe the "Has ID supported by two or more" item shouldn't be marked as completed in such cases.

I'm just asking to better understand the purpose of this, I'm not judging the PR itself.

Yeah, updating the DQA was something I was working on yesterday, just pushed that commit. "Supported by two or more" is still accurate, there's just an additional requirement that the Observation Taxon match the Community Taxon. Currently we're blocked b/c we don't understand some of the ways the Observation Taxon gets set, so we need Scott to weigh in.