Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
|
We are definitely excited to upgrade from Has We will need to come up with a sensible migration strategy to handle the matrix of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
npm supports this (npm/cli#7766). For the others, I found these which are great to read for context:
So ultimately, it seems adoption is still in progress with Node.js seemingly planning to remove corepack in favour of |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Great, thank you for finding those. We'll be looking to this when we can. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Continued here #10848 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Goals
devEnginesin package.jsonBackground
The
devEnginesfield in the package.json should be supported. Currently, onlypackageManageris scanned:turborepo/crates/turborepo-repository/src/package_manager/mod.rs
Lines 455 to 458 in 13bfef4
I noticed pnpm is used here. pnpm also does not support
devEnginesas of now: pnpm/pnpm#8153Proposal
During this period, I believe both should be checked with a priority of
devEngines.Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions