这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to content

Conversation

@jcorbett-tandent
Copy link

The language would not have included federal employees other than those of the executive branch due to use of the word "agency." That is, an assistant to a member of Congress or the court clerk of a federal judge do not work for an "agency," but do work for the federal government. The changes expand the definition of who is covered.

Jonathan Corbett
jon@professional-troublemaker.com

The language would not have included federal employees other than those of the executive branch due to use of the word "agency."  That is, an assistant to a member of Congress or the court clerk of a federal judge do not work for an "agency," but do work for the federal government.  The changes expand the definition of who is covered.

Jonathan Corbett
jon@professional-troublemaker.com
@mMerlin
Copy link

mMerlin commented Jul 10, 2017

LOL. How many "United States federal governments" are there anyway?

Line 10 says "on behalf of a United States federal government". Probably intended "on behalf of the United States federal government". The "a" got missed when "agency" was removed.

I could not figure out how to directly show the change here. I have seen done for other cases, but my searches did not turn up the syntax to reference content from the 'files changed' tab, instead of standard repo file.

{{#tip}}

This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of a United States federal government agency. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of a United States federal government. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
Copy link

@mMerlin mMerlin Jul 10, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"a United States federal government" should be "the United States federal government". At least as far as I know, there is only one at a time.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

looks like there is a capitalization typo -- shouldn't it be GitHub not GItHub?

@jcorbett-tandent
Copy link
Author

@mMerlin Adjusted to address your feedback.

{{#tip}}

This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of a United States federal government agency. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of the United States federal government. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
Copy link

@privatwolke privatwolke Jul 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you are not using GItHub

Should have lowercase i.

... applies to you

Since "Terms of Service" is plural, it should be apply to you

Copy link

@mMerlin mMerlin Jul 11, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does that second "a U.S. federal government agency" need to be changed as well? Or is the below verbiage, ending in (the "Agency") enough to handle it?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will leave that to their lawyers. ;) Just raising the issue.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 16, 2017

What about state/federal university employees? I am new to the subject matter. Can someone please break-down in lamens terms why there exists two different documents?

@mMerlin
Copy link

mMerlin commented Jul 16, 2017

@mancoast, I believe that the relevant piece is the unchanged line 16. The specified people have additional constraints on what they can and must do. I (just me, no background) would expect that those additional clauses would apply whether they were explicitly included or not. This is just a reminder that they are not playing in their own sandbox. Standard verbiage that basically says follow the rules that are already in place. That using the system does not excuse them from existing agreements.

@konklone
Copy link

There are legislative agencies and judicial agencies. The use of "agency" doesn't exclude non-executive branch agencies.

{{#tip}}

This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of a United States federal government agency. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
This Amendment to GitHub's [Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies only to users that are using GitHub on behalf of the United States federal government. If you are not using GItHub on behalf of a U.S. federal government agency, the standard [GitHub Terms of Service](/articles/github-terms-of-service) applies to you.
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

****

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jul 21, 2017

The service is being adopted widely, and any inconvenience due to confusion may limit contributions to public domain. Please be careful to prevent interference with students that kindly offer their work on github.

@nsqe
Copy link
Contributor

nsqe commented Aug 1, 2017

Thanks, @jcorbett-tandent and everyone else who made suggestions here!

We agree, and we're revising this language. We should have an updated PR up shortly. I'm going to go on and close this PR — again, thank you for calling our attention to it!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants