The current version of the post-processing for the UMD line burner flame heights show two things that I think need to be addressed. First, there is a hiccup in the high res plots at 18% O2. Probably this has something to do with the time averaging window. Second, the reported simulated propane flame height is significantly different than the data, which I do not believe to be correct. I suspect this has something to do with the definitions of L_f we are using. I do not believe we are off by 30% in flame height.