这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Perception & Psychophysics
  3. Article

The role of attention in different visual-search tasks

  • Published: September 1992
  • Volume 51, pages 465–472, (1992)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Perception & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
The role of attention in different visual-search tasks
Download PDF
  • Mary J. Bravo1 &
  • Ken Nakayama1 nAff2 
  • 7084 Accesses

  • 362 Citations

  • 3 Altmetric

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Observers viewed displays containing a variable number of distractors of one color and a target of another color. In some experiments, the target and distractors maintained their color from trial to trial; in others, they reversed unpredictably. Observers made a speeded two-choice judgment concerning either the presence, the color, or the shape of the odd-colored target. With only one exception, all of these conditions produced the same pattern of results: reaction times remained constant as the number of distractors increased. The exceptional result occurred when observers judged the shape of the odd-colored target and the color of the target and distractors reversed unpredictably. In this case, reaction times decreased as the number of distractors increased. These results are interpreted in terms of the attentional requirements of the different judgments and the mechanisms that guide attention.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Eye movements reveal the contributions of early and late processes of enhancement and suppression to the guidance of visual search

Article Open access 20 July 2022

Measuring the time course of selection during visual search

Article 21 September 2018

Feature-based attention warps the perception of visual features

Article Open access 20 April 2023

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognition
  • Cognitive Science
  • Color Perception
  • Psychophysics
  • Visual Perception
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allman, J., Miezen, F., &McGuiness, E. (1985). Stimulus specific responses from beyond the classical receptive field: Neurophysiological mechanisms for local-global comparisons in visual neurons.Annual Review of Neuroscience,8, 407–430.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, W., &Egeth, H. (1991). Local processes in preattentive feature detection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen, J., &Julesz, B. (1983). Rapid discrimination of visual patterns.I. E. E.E. Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernetics,SMC-13, 857–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donderi, D. C., &Zelnicker, D. (1969). Parallel processing in visual same-different decisions.Perception & Psychophysics,5, 197–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, J., &Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity.Psychological Review,96, 433–458.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egeth, H., Jonides, J., &Wall, S. (1972). Parallel processing of multi-element displays.Cognitive Psychology,3, 674–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, C. W., &St. James, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model.Perception & Psychophysics,40, 225–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, W. K., &Wessel, D. L. (1966). Reaction time in relation to display size and correctness of response in forced-choice visual signal detection.Perception & Psychophysics,1, 369–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, B., &Breitmeyer, B. (1987). Mechanisms of visual attention revealed by saccadic eye movements.Neuropsychologia,25, 73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groner, R., &Groner, M. T. (1989). Attention and eye movement control: An overview.European Archives of Psychiatry & Neurological Sciences,239, 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julesz, B. (1986). Texton gradients: The texton theory revisited.Biological Cybernetics,54, 245–251.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., &Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry.Human Neurobiology,4, 219–227.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., &Brown, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification.Psychological Review,96, 101–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legge, G., Pelli, D., Rubin, G. S., &Schleske, M. M. (1985). Psychophysics of reading. I. Normal vision.Vision Research,25, 239–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mayfrank, L., Mobashery, M., Kimmig, H., &Fischer, B. (1986). The role of fixation and visual attention in the occurrence of express saccades in man.European Archives of Psychiatry & Neurological Sciences,235, 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.),Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411–422). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1963). Decision-time without reaction time: Experiments in visual scanning.American Journal of Psychology,76, 376–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. (1980). Orienting of attention.Quanerly Journal of Experimental Psychology,32, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K. (1978). Eye movements in reading and information processing.Psychology Bulletin,85, 618–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remington, R. W. (1980). Attention and saccadic eye movements.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 726–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, W., &Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing. I. Detection, search, and attention.Psychological Review,84, 1–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A. (1988). Feature and objects: The fourteenth Bartlett memorial lecture.Quanerly Journal of Experimental Psychology,40A, 201–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treisman, A., &Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention.Cognitive Psychology,12, 97–136.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., &Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided search: An alternative to the feature integration model of visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,15, 419–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yantis, S., &Jonides, J. (1984). Abrupt visual onsets and selective visual attention: Evidence from visual search.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 601–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes
  1. Ken Nakayama

    Present address: Department of Psychology, Harvard University, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, 2232 Webster St., 94115, San Francisco, CA

    Mary J. Bravo & Ken Nakayama

Authors
  1. Mary J. Bravo
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ken Nakayama
    View author publications

    Search author on:PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary J. Bravo.

Additional information

This work was supported by Grant IF32 EY06155 from the NEI and Grant 83–0320 from the AFOSR.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bravo, M.J., Nakayama, K. The role of attention in different visual-search tasks. Perception & Psychophysics 51, 465–472 (1992). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211642

Download citation

  • Received: 19 August 1991

  • Accepted: 27 December 1991

  • Issue Date: September 1992

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211642

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Visual Search
  • Focal Attention
  • Gabor Patch
  • Reaction Time Result
  • Shape Judgment
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Language editing
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

23.94.208.52

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature