Abstract
In this paper, I introduce a modal logic CS5, an expansion of the non-connexive propositional classical logic with modalities with a tweaked falsification condition, thereby rendered a connexive modal logic. The logic is defined with a hyper-sequent calculus, properly modified from that of classical S5.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Notes
Actually, expansion, since the vocabulary is enriched with modal operators.
This modality was first considered in [5]. This equivalence is known in the literature for a modality with a linear accessibility relation.
In [8], the modalized formula is repeated in the premise, to obtain invertibility of the rules. Since this issue is orthogonal to connexiuvity, I present the simpler version of the rules.
Recall that the original falsity condition fot ‘\(\Box \)’ is
$$\begin{aligned} {{\mathcal {M}}}, s \models ^{-} \Box \varphi \ \textrm{iff}\ \exists t \in W:\ {{\mathcal {M}}},t \models ^{-} \varphi \end{aligned}$$Actually, those are axiom schemes. I use ‘axioms’ for brevity.
References
Almukdad, A., Nelson, D.: Constructible falsity and inexact predicates. J. Symb. Log. 49, 231–233 (1984)
Estrada-González, L.: The Bochum plan and the foundations of contra-classical logics. CLE, 19(1), (2020)
Estrada-González, L.: Possibility, Consistency, Connexivity. In: Olivetti, Nicola, Verbrugge, Rineke, Negri, Sara, Sandu, Gabriel (eds.) 13th Conference on Advances in Modal Logic. AiML 2020, Helsinki, Finland, pp. 189–207. College Publications, London (2020)
Francez, N.: A view of Connexive Logics. College Publications, London (2021)
Francez, N.: Negation-cohesive connectives: a generalization of connexivity. Logic Journal of the IGPL special issue on connexive logics, edited by Luis Estrada-González and Fernando Cano-Jorge, (2024)
Kamide, N., Wansing, H.: Connexive modal logic based on positive S4. In Jean-Yves Béziau and Marcelo Conigli, editors, Logic without Frontiers, pages 389–409. College Publications, King’s College, London, (2011). Festschrift for Walter Alexandre Carnielli on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday
Nelson, D.: Constructible falsity. J. Symb. Log. 14, 16–26 (1949)
Poggiolesi, F.: A cut-free simple sequent calculus for modal logic S5. Rev. Symbol. Logic 1(1), 3–15 (2008)
Wansing, H.: Connexive modal logic. In Renate Schmidt, Ian Pratt-Hartmann, Mark Reynolds, and Heinrich Wansing, editors, Advances in modal logic, volume 5, pages 367–383. College Publications, King’s College, London, (2005)
Wansing, H.: Connexive logic. In Edward N. Zalta, editor, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Summer 2022 edition, (2022). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/logic-connexive/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Apendix
Apendix
The characteristic axiomsFootnote 6 of connexive logics (see [4] and [10] for a general survey) are:
- Aristotle’s axioms:.:
-
For every \(\varphi \):
$$\begin{aligned} & A_{1}:\ {\vdash }\ \lnot (\varphi {\rightarrow }\lnot \varphi ) \end{aligned}$$(5.21)$$\begin{aligned} & A_{2}:\ {\vdash }\ \lnot (\lnot \varphi {\rightarrow }\varphi ) \end{aligned}$$(5.22) - Boethius’ axioms:.:
-
For every \(\varphi \) and \(\psi \):
$$\begin{aligned} & B_{1}:\ {\vdash }\ (\varphi {\rightarrow }\psi ) {\rightarrow }\lnot (\varphi {\rightarrow }\lnot \psi ) \end{aligned}$$(5.23)$$\begin{aligned} & B_{2}:\ {\vdash }\ (\varphi {\rightarrow }\lnot \psi ) {\rightarrow }\lnot (\varphi {\rightarrow }\ \psi ) \end{aligned}$$(5.24)
Also a negative characteristic is added, a non-derivability, to the effect that
The condition (asym) is known as the asymmetry of the conditional, and is imposed to prevent interpreting the conditional as a biconditional.
Those axioms are not classical logic validities, rendering connexive logics as contra-classical. They have a strong intuitive appeal, reflecting properties of a “natural” conditional, closer to some uses of the indicative conditional in natural language.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Francez, N. Another Look at Modality and Connexivity. Log. Univers. 19, 131–139 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-025-00372-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-025-00372-8