这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to main content
Log in

An automatic fine-grained skeleton segmentation method for whole-body bone scintigraphy using atlas-based registration

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBS) is one of the common imaging methods in nuclear medicine. It is a time-consuming, tedious, and error-prone issue for physicians to determine the location of bone lesions which is important for the qualitative diagnosis of bone lesions. In this paper, an automatic fine-grained skeleton segmentation method for WBS is developed.

Method

The proposed method contains four steps. In the first step, a novel denoising method is proposed to remove the noise from WBS which benefits the location of the skeleton. In the second step, a restoration method based on gray probability distribution is developed to repair the partial contamination caused by the high local density of radionuclide. Then, the standardization for WBS is performed by the exact histogram matching. Finally, the deformation field between the atlas and the input WBS is calculated by registration, and the segmentation mask of the input WBS is obtained by wrapping the segmentation mask of the atlas with the deformation field.

Results

The experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms the traditional registration (Morphon): mean square error decreased from \(11.14 \times 10^{-3}\) to \(2.10 \times 10^{-3}\), peak signal-to-noise ratio increased from 21.26 to 26.92, and mean structural similarity increased from 0.9986 to 0.9998.

Conclusions

Our experiments show that the proposed method can achieve robust and fine-grained results which outperform the traditional registration method, indicating it could be helpful in clinical application. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that implements a fully automated fine-grained skeleton segmentation method for WBS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://github.com/wkentaro/labelme.

References

  1. Bambara LT, Kyere AK, Hasford F, Sosu EK, Wilson IK (2015) Estimation of kidney and bladder radionuclide activity for patients undergoing bone scan. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8(3):317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buckley O, O’Keeffe S, Geoghegan T, Lyburn ID, Munk PL, Worsley D, Torreggiani WC (2007) 99mtc bone scintigraphy superscans: a review. Nucl Med Commun 28(7):521–527

  3. Chang Q, Wang Q, Qiao Y, Zhu Y, Huang G, Yang J (2011) Adaptive detection of hotspots in thoracic spine from bone scintigraphy. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 257–264

  4. Gass T, Székely G, Goksel O (2012) Semi-supervised segmentation using multiple segmentation hypotheses from a single atlas. In: International MICCAI workshop on medical computer vision. Springer, pp 29–37

  5. Huang J-Y, Kao P-F, Chen Y-S (2007) A set of image processing algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis in nuclear medicine whole body bone scan images. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 54(3):514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jeong CB, Kim KG, Kim TS, Kim SK (2011) Comparison of image enhancement methods for the effective diagnosis in successive whole-body bone scans. J Digit Imaging 24(3):424–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Knutsson H, Andersson M (2005) Morphons: paint on priors and elastic canvas for segmentation and registration. In: Scandinavian conference on image analysis. Springer, pp 292–301

  8. Love C, Din AS, Tomas MB, Kalapparambath TP, Palestro CJ (2003) Radionuclide bone imaging: an illustrative review. Radiographics 23(2):341–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Sullivan GJ, Carty FL, Cronin CG (2015) Imaging of bone metastasis: an update. World J Radiol 7(8):202

  10. Sadik M, Hamadeh I, Nordblom P, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L (2008) Computer-assisted interpretation of planar whole-body bone scans. J Nucl Med 49(12):1958–1965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Šajn L, Kukar M, Kononenko I, Milčinski M (2005) Computerized segmentation of whole-body bone scintigrams and its use in automated diagnostics. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 80(1):47–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Shimizu A, Wakabayashi H, Kanamori T, Saito A, Nishikawa K, Daisaki H, Higashiyama S, Kawabe J (2020) Automated measurement of bone scan index from a whole-body bone scintigram. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 15(3):389–400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sjöstrand K, Ohlsson M, Edenbrandt L (2009) Statistical regularization of deformation fields for atlas-based segmentation of bone scintigraphy images. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, pp 664–671

  14. Sudoł-Szopińska I, Ćwikła JB (2013) Current imaging techniques in rheumatology: MRI, scintigraphy and pet. Polish J Radiol 78(3):48

  15. Thirion J-P (1998) Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell’s demons

  16. Wang Q, Chang Q, Qiao Y, Zhu Y, Huang G, Yang J (2011) Knowledge-based segmentation of spine and ribs from bone scintigraphy. In: International conference on neural information processing. Springer, pp 241–248

  17. Xu H, Geng S, Qiao Y, Xu K, Gu Y (2020) Combining cgan and mil for hotspot segmentation in bone scintigraphy. In: ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, pp 1404–1408

  18. Yang H-L, Liu T, Wang X-M, Xu Y, Deng S-M (2011) Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing 18 FDG PET, CT. MRI and bone scintigraphy. Eur Radiol 21(12):2604–2617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin T-K, Chiu N-T (2004) A computer-aided diagnosis for locating abnormalities in bone scintigraphy by a fuzzy system with a three-step minimization approach. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 23(5):639–654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhou L, Qiao Y, Yang J (2013) A knowledge-driven segmentation method for ribs in bone scintigraphy using MRF model. In: 2013 seventh international conference on internet computing for engineering and science. IEEE, pp 109–115

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China under Grant 2018AAA0100201, Sichuan Science and Technology Program under Grant 2020JDRC0042, and 1.3.5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYGD18016).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhen Zhao or Zhang Yi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wei, J., Cai, H., Pi, Y. et al. An automatic fine-grained skeleton segmentation method for whole-body bone scintigraphy using atlas-based registration. Int J CARS 17, 673–681 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02579-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02579-2

Keywords