这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to main content
Log in

Frame-wise detection of surgeon stress levels during laparoscopic training using kinematic data

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Excessive stress experienced by the surgeon can have a negative effect on the surgeon’s technical skills. The goal of this study is to evaluate and validate a deep learning framework for real-time detection of stressed surgical movements using kinematic data.

Methods

30 medical students were recruited as the subjects to perform a modified peg transfer task and were randomized into two groups, a control group (n=15) and a stressed group (n=15) that completed the task under deteriorating, simulated stressful conditions. To classify stressed movements, we first developed an attention-based Long-Short-Term-Memory recurrent neural network (LSTM) trained to classify normal/stressed trials and obtain the contribution of each data frame to the stress level classification. Next, we extracted the important frames from each trial and used another LSTM network to implement the frame-wise classification of normal and stressed movements.

Results

The classification between normal and stressed trials using attention-based LSTM model reached an overall accuracy of 75.86% under Leave-One-User-Out (LOUO) cross-validation. The second LSTM classifier was able to distinguish between the typical normal and stressed movement with an accuracy of 74.96% with an 8-second observation under LOUO. Finally, the normal and stressed movements in stressed trials could be classified with the accuracy of 68.18% with a 16-second observation under LOUO.

Conclusion

In this study, we extracted the movements which are more likely to be affected by stress and validated the feasibility of using LSTM and kinematic data for frame-wise detection of stress level during laparoscopic training. The proposed classifier could be potentially be integrated with robot-assisted surgery platforms for stress management purposes

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anton NE, Montero PN, Howley LD, Brown C, Stefanidis D (2015) What stress coping strategies are surgeons relying upon during surgery? Am J Surg 210:846–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Nestel D, Tierney T, Woloshynowych M, Kneebone R (2009) Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? Am J Surg 197(4):537–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.02.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arora S, Sevdalis N, Aggarwal R, Sirimanna P, Darzi A, Kneebone R (2010) Stress impairs psychomotor performance in novice laparoscopic surgeons. Surg Endosc 24(10):2588–2593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahdanau D, Cho KH, Bengio Y (2015) Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In: 3rd international conference on learning representations, ICLR 2015 - Conference track proceedings, International conference on learning representations, ICLR, 1409.0473

  5. Berguer R, Smith WD, Chung YH (2001) Performing laparoscopic surgery is significantly more stressful for the surgeon than open surgery. Surg Endosc 15(10):1204–1207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Böhm B, Rötting N, Schwenk W, Grebe S, Mansmann U (2001) A prospective randomized trial on heart rate variability of the surgical team during laparoscopic and conventional sigmoid resection. Arch Surg 136(3):305–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Boucsein W (2012) Electrodermal activity. Springer, US

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Chollet F (2015) Keras. https://github.com/fchollet/keras

  9. Czyzewska E, Kiczka K, Czarnecki A, Pokinko P (1983) The surgeon’s mental load during decision making at various stages of operations. Eur J Appl Physiol 51(3):441–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. DiPietro R, Lea C, Malpani A, Ahmidi N, Vedula SS, Lee GI, Lee MR, Hager GD (2016) Recognizing surgical activities with recurrent neural networks. In: Ourselin S, Joskowicz L, Sabuncu MR, Unal G, Wells W (eds) Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention - MICCAI 2016. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 551–558

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fard MJ, Ameri S, Darin Ellis R, Chinnam RB, Pandya AK, Klein MD (2018) Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: predictive analytics approach. Int J Med Robot Comput Assisted Surg. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Goodell KH, Cao CG, Schwaitzberg SD (2006) Effects of cognitive distraction on performance of laparoscopic surgical tasks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 16(2):94–98. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2006.16.94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hochreiter S, Schmidhuber J (1997) Long short-term memory. Neural Comput 9(8):1735–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kannan S, Yengera G, Mutter D, Marescaux J, Padoy N (2020) Future-state predicting LSTM for early surgery type recognition. IEEE Trans Med Imag 39(3):556–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leonard G, Cao J, Scielzo S, Zheng Y, Tellez J, Zeh HJ, Fey AM (2020) The effect of stress and conscientiousness on simulated surgical performance in unbalanced groups: a Bayesian Hierarchical Model. J Am Coll Surg 231(4):S258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.07.397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ma D, Li S, Zhang X, Wang H (2017) Interactive attention networks for aspect-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of 2018 10th international conference on knowledge and systems engineering, KSE 2018 pp 25–30, http://arxiv.org/abs/1709.00893, 1709.00893

  17. Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznich R, Macrae H, Murnaghan J, Hutchison C, Brown M (1997) Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 84(2):273–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1997.02502.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Milenkoski M, Trivodaliev K, Kalajdziski S, Jovanov M, Stojkoska BR (2018) Real time human activity recognition on smartphones using LSTM networks. In: 2018 41st International convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics, MIPRO 2018 - Proceedings, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., pp 1126–1131

  19. Moorthy K, Munz Y, Dosis A, Bann S, Darzi A (2003) The effect of stress-inducing conditions on the performance of a laparoscopic task. Surg Endosc Other Interv Tech 17(9):1481–1484

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nammous MK, Saeed K (2019) Natural language processing: Speaker, language, and gender identification with LSTM. In: Advances in intelligent systems and computing, Springer Verlag, vol 883, pp 143–156, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3702-4_9

  21. Pandey PS (2017) Machine Learning and IoT for prediction and detection of stress. In: Proceedings of the 2017 17th International conference on computational science and its applications, ICCSA 2017, Institute of electrical and electronics engineers Inc., https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCSA.2017.8000018

  22. Qin Y, Feyzabadi S, Allan M, Burdick JW, Azizian M (2020) daVinciNet: Joint prediction of motion and surgical state in robot-assisted surgery. arXiv http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11937, 2009.11937

  23. Ryan ED (1962) Effects of stress on motor performance and learning. Research quarterly. Am Assoc Health, Phys Educ Recreat 33(1):111–119

    Google Scholar 

  24. Sielberger C, Gorsuch R, Vagg P, Jacobs G (1983) Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (form y)

  25. Tendulkar AP, Victorino GP, Chong TJ, Bullard MK, Liu TH, Harken AH (2005) Quantification of surgical resident stress oncall. J Am College Surg 201(4):560–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vedula SS, Malpani A, Ahmidi N, Khudanpur S, Hager G, Chen CCG (2016) Task-level vs. segment-level quantitative metrics for surgical skill assessment. J Surg Educ 73(3):482–489

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang Z, Majewicz Fey A (2018) Deep learning with convolutional neural network for objective skill evaluation in robot-assisted surgery. Int J Comput Assisted Radiol Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-018-1860-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Weenk M, Alken AP, Engelen LJ, Bredie SJ, van de Belt TH, van Goor H (2018) Stress measurement in surgeons and residents using a smart patch. Am J Surg 216(2):361–368

  29. Zhang B, Xiong D, Su J (2020) Neural machine translation with deep attention. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 42(1):154–163. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2876404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng Y, Leonard G, Zeh H, Tellez J, Majewicz Fey A (2021) Identifying kinematic markers associated with intraoperative stress during surgical training tasks. In: IEEE International Symposium on Medical Robotics (ISMR), pp 1–7

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the UTSW Training Resident Doctors As Innovators in Science (TARDIS) program, supporting co-Author Grey Leonard. We would like to thank the UTSW Simulation Center director and staff for their invaluable assistance with data collection. We also thank Dr. Chang Su at Weill Cornell Medical College, Cornell University, for his help with understanding deep learning architectures.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant number #1846726 and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grant number #1R01EB030125-01. The UTSW Training Resident Doctors As Innovators in Science (TARDIS) program financially supported co-Author Grey Leonard.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Zheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Availability of Data and Material

Data used in this study could be made available by request.

CodeAvailability

The analysis code used in this study could be made available by request.

Ethics Approval

This experiment was conducted using ethical practices in accordance with the University of Texas at Dallas (#14-57) and UTSW IRB offices (STU #032015-053).

Consent to Participate

Written consent was obtained from the subjects to participate in this study, following IRB guidelines.

Consent to Publish

The consent form for this study included language indicating that this research would potentially lead to a scientific publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zheng, Y., Leonard, G., Zeh, H. et al. Frame-wise detection of surgeon stress levels during laparoscopic training using kinematic data. Int J CARS 17, 785–794 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02568-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Version of record:

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-022-02568-5

Keywords

Profiles

  1. Yi Zheng