Abstract
This study explores an efficient approach to providing customized public services through a smart governance-based public service innovation model (SG-PSIM) that combines intelligent technology and co-creation. Multiple methodological approaches are applied to develop and evaluate the proposed SG-PSIM. Intelligent methodologies that can support the public service policy process are discussed, and the applicability of the SG-PSIM is demonstrated through four case studies. The study results showed that SG-PSIM can effectively collect the opinions of citizens in diverse ways and provide opportunities for citizens to actively participate in the development of public service policies.
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 85
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 117
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 120
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 52
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 153
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 183
source: Hong et al. (2020), p. 185
source: Park and Lee (2020), p. 71
source: Kim and Hong (2021), p. 4
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the first author [hongsoongoo@dtu.edu.vn] upon request.
References
Androutsopoulou A, Charalabidis Y (2018) A framework for evidence based policy making combining big data, dynamic modelling and machine intelligence. In: ICEGOV ‘18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp 575–583
Araujo R, Taher Y, Heuvel W, Cappelli C (2013) Evolving government-citizen ties in public service design and delivery. In: Conference: IFIP WG 8.5 s Working Conference on EGOV, pp 19–26.
Arku RN, Buttazzoni A, Agyapon-Ntra K, Bandauko E (2022) Highlighting smart city mirages in public perceptions: a Twitter sentiment analysis of four African smart city projects. Cities 130:103857
Bright J, Margetts H (2016) Big data and public policy: can it succeed where e-participation has failed? Policy Internet 8(3):218–224
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Stone MM (2006) The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: propositions form the literature. Public Adm Rev 66:44–55
City of Boston. https://www.boston.gov/departments/boston-311 Accessed 8 Feb 2023
Chin HS, Marasini DP, Lee DH (2023) Digital transformation trends in service industries. Serv Bus 17(1):11–36
Cole A, La, C, Stivas D, Tran É (2023) The ‘Smart City’ between urban narrative and empty signifier: the case of Hong Kong. In: Cole A, Healy A, Morel-Journel C. (2022) Constructing narratives for city governance: Transnational perspectives on urban narration Edward Elgar, pp 135–150
Cornwall Council, United Kingdom, Tell us once, gok.uk, https://www.cornwall.gov.uk/births-marriages-deaths/deaths-funerals-and-cremation/tell-us-once/ Accessed 24 Jan 2023
Drissa OB, Melloulib S, Trabelsib Z (2019) From citizens to government policy-makers: social media data analysis. Gov Inf Q 36:560–570
Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Admin Res Theory 22(1):1–29
Eom SJ, Lee J (2022) Digital government transformation in turbulent times: responses, challenges, and future direction. Gov Inf Q 39(2): 101690 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101690
Givoni M (2012) Re-assessing the results of the London congestion charging scheme. Urban Stud 49(5):1089–1105
Grindle MS (2004) Good enough governance: poverty reduction and reform in developing countries. Governance 17(4):525–548
Hartley K (2023) Public perceptions about smart cities: governance and quality-of-life in Hong Kong. Soc Indic Res 166:731–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-023-03087-9
Hassani H, Beneki C, Unger S, Mazinani MT, Yeganegi MR (2020) Text mining in big data analytics. Big Data Cogn Comput 4(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc4010001
Hong S, Kim N, Lee T, Han EJ (2017) New regional innovation model: smart governance. Youwon Books, Seoul
Hong S, Ryu S, Ahn S (2019) Sentimatal analysis on urban regeneration policy: focused on reviews of Gamcheon culture village. J Korean Data Inform Sci Soci 30(6):1233–1244
Hong S, Ryu S, Kim N, Lee T, Lee SM, Ahn S (2020) Smart governance: policy process innovation. Youwon Books, Seoul
Howlett M, Ramesh M (2003) Studying public policy: policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press, Toronto
Iqbal A, Amin R, Iqbal J, Alroobaea R, Binmahfoudh A, Hussain M (2022) Sentiment analysis of consumer reviews using deep learning. Sustainability 14(17):10844. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141710844
Kankanhalli A, Charalabidis Y, Mellouli S (2019) IoT and AI for smart government: a research agenda. Gov Inf Q 36(2):304–309
Kenter JO, O’Brien L, Hockley N, Ravenscroft N, Fazey I, Irvine KN, Reed MS, Christie M, Brady E, Bryce R, Church A, Cooper N, Davies A, Evely A, Everard M, Fish R, Fisher JA, Jobstvogt N, Molloy C, Orchard-Webb J, Ranger S, Ryan M, Watson V, Williams S (2015) What are shared and social values of ecosystems? Ecol Econ 111:86–99
Kim N, Hong S (2021) Automatic classification of citizen requests for transportation using deep learning: case study from Boston city. Inf Process Manage 58(1):102410
Kowalski R, Esteve M, Mikhaylov SJ (2020) Improving public services by mining citizen feedback: an application of natural language processing. Public Administartion 98(4):1011–1026
Lee S, Lee D (2020) “Untact”: a new customer service strategy in the digital age. Serv Bus 14(1):1–22
Lee S, Lee D (2021) Opportunities and challenges for contactless healthcare services in the post-COVID-19 Era. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 167:120712
Lee T, Hong S, Jeong H (2020) An automatic analysis of public debate of local assembly by utilizing a facet analysis. Korea Assoc Policy Stud 29(1):47–68
Lindgren I, Madsen ØC, Hofmann S, Melin U (2019) Close encounters of the digital kind: a research agenda for the digitalization of public services. Gov Inf Q 36(3):427–436
Marinov R (2019) New intelligent technologies - interactivity and information issues. Adv J Commun 7:94–108
McCombs M (2005) A look at agenda-setting: past, present and future. J Stud 6(4):543–557
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport of Korea, http://www.molit.go.kr/USR/NEWS/m_71/dtl.jsp?id=95081734, Accessed 23 Dec 2018
Munné R (2016) Big data in the public sector. In: Cavanillas J, Curry E, Wahlster W (eds) New Horizons for a data-driven economy. Springer, New York
Oosthuizen RM (2022) The fourth industrial revolution - smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics and algorithms: industrial psychologists in future workplaces. Front Artif Intell 1(5):1–13
Park JS, Lee SM (2020) Big data analysis of Busan civil affairs using the LDA topic modeling technique. Inform Policy 27(2):66–83
Rha JS, Lee HH (2022) Research trends in digital transformation in the service sector: a review based on network text analysis. Serv Bus 16:77–98
Ritchey T (2006) Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. J Oper Res Soc 57(7):792–801
Ryu SE, Kim HJ, Hong SG (2022) Public service innovation using smart governance. J Public Policy Admin 7(1):1–20
Sadilek A, Caty S, DiPrete L, Mansour R, Jr S, Bergtholdt M, Jha A, Ramaswami P, Gabrilovich E (2018) Machine-learned epidemiology: real-time detection of foodborne illness at scale. Digital Med 1(36):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-018-0045-1
Sarker M, Wu M, Hossin M (2018) Smart governance through bigdata: digital transformation of public agencies. Int Conf Artif Intell Big Data (ICAIBD) 2018:62–70
Schofield J (2001) Time for a revival? public policy implementation: a review of the literature and an agenda for future research. Int J Manag Rev 3(3):245–263
Scholta H, Mertens W, Kowalkiewicz M, Becker J (2019) From one-stop shop to no-stop shop: an e-government stage model. Gov Inf Q 36(1):11–26
Shiffman J (2008) Agenda setting in public health policy. In: Quah S, Heggenhougen K (eds) International encyclopedia of public health. Academic Press, Cambridge
Statista, https://www.statista.com/ Accessed 6 Jan 2023
Vial G (2019) Understanding digital transformation: a review and a research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 28(2):118–144
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2018S1A3A2075240).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors have conceptualization, writing the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hong, S.G., Lee, D. Development of a citizen participation public service innovation model based on smart governance. Serv Bus 17, 669–694 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00536-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00536-w