Correction to: International Journal of Computer Vision https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-024-02340-z

The original version of this article contained inadvertent typos requiring the following revisions.

The article title was given as “Generalized Robotic Vision-Language Learning Model via Linguistic Foreground-Aware Contrast” but should have been “Generalized Robot Vision-Language Model via Linguistic Foreground-Aware Contrast”.

The affiliation details for Author Chaoqun Wang were given as “The Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China” but should have been “The School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China”.

The affiliation details for Author Xiaodong Han were given as “The School of Control Science and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, China” but should have been “The School of Control Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China”.

The affiliation details for Author Yong-Jin Liu were given as “The School of Control Engineering, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China” but should have been “The Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China”.

In this article, the part of the caption to Fig. 3 “Please refer to the colored figures online for detailed information” was inadvertently omitted.

The complete caption of Fig. 3 is given here.

Figure 3 Visualizations of projected point correlation maps over the indoor ScanNet (1st-4th rows) and the outdoor KITTI (5th-8th rows) with respect to the query points highlighted by yellow crosses. The View 1 and View 2 in each sample show the intra-view and cross-view correlations, respectively. We compare FAC with the state-of-the-art CSC (Hou et al., 2021) on segmentation (rows 1–4) and ProCo (Yin et al., 2022) on detection (rows 5–8). FAC clearly captures better feature correlations within and across views (columns 3–4). Please refer to the colored figures online for detailed information

In this article, the footnote “The bold highlights the results of our proposed approaches” to Table 1 was inadvertently omitted.

In Table 16 of this article, the data ‘Adapted PFH [?]’ in the column headed “Experimental results for the z / SO(3) as well as SO(3) / SO(3)” was incorrectly published without the reference citation. But it should have been ‘Adapted PFH (Liu, 2023d)’.

The original article has been corrected.