这是indexloc提供的服务,不要输入任何密码
Skip to main content

The Risk Factor in the Adaptation of Worksites in ICT-Related Jobs

  • Conference paper
Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 5105))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3983 Accesses

  • 1 Citation

Abstract

If working tasks are carried out in inadequate conditions, workers with functional limitations may, over time, risk developing further disabilities. While several validated risk assessment methods exist for able-bodied workers, few studies have been carried out for workers with disabilities. This paper, which reports the preliminary findings of a Study funded by the Italian Ministry of Labour, describes a general methodology for the technical and organizational re-design of a worksite, based on risk assessment and irrespective of any worker disability. To this end, two samples of disabled workers, composed of people with mild and severe motor disabilities, were recruited. By using a mix of risk assessment methods and the ICF taxonomy, an adapted worksite was designed for the individual workers in the study, and a prospective evaluation was carried out to check whether the new design would eliminate the risks. One case study is reported in detail - a man with congenital malformations who works as a help-desk operator for technical assistance in the ICT department of a big organization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook, A., Hussey, S.: Assistive Technology – principles and practice. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zolna, J., Sanford, J., Sabata, D., Goldthwaite, J.: Review of accommodation strategies in the workplace for persons with mobility and dexterity impairments: application to criteria for universal design. Technology and Disability 19, 189–198 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Delleman, N.J., Dul, J.: International standards on working postures and movements ISO 11226 and EN 1005-4. Ergonomics 50(11), 1809–1819 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. ISO. ISO 11226, Ergonomics evaluation of static working postures (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. CEN, EN 1005-4, Safety of machinery - Human physical performance - Part 4: Evaluation of working postures and movements in relation to machinery (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colombini, D., Occhipinti, E., Fanti, M.: Il metodo OCRA per l’analisi e la prevenzione del rischio da movimenti ripetuti, Franco Angeli, Milano (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. NIOSH, Center for Diseases Control and Prevention. Musculo-skeletal Disorders and Workplace Factors. A critical review of Epidemiologic Evidence for WMSDs of the neck, Upper extremity and Low Back. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Snook, S.H., Ciriello, V.M.: The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics 4(9), 1197–1213 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Battevi, N., Menoni, O., Ricci, M.G., Cairoli, S.: MAPO index for risk assessment of patient manual handling in hospital wards: a validation study. Ergonomics 49(7), 671–687 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Karhu, O., Kansi, P., Kuorinka, I.: Correcting working postures in industry: A practical method for analysis. Applied Ergonomics 8(4), 199–201 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. McAtamney, L., Nigel Corlett, E.: RULA: a survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb disorders. Applied Ergonomics 24(2), 91–99 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. World Health Organization: ICF - International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. WHO, Geneva (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. ISO, ISO/CD 16840-1 173/SC1/WG 11 Wheelchair seating - part 01 - Terms and Definitions - (proposed change) Definitions of Body and Seat Measures (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. UNI, UNI EN 1335-1, Office work chair dimensions - Determination of dimensions (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. UNI, UNI-EN 1335-2, Office Work Chair - Safety requirements (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scherer, M.J., Craddock, G.: Matching Person & Technology (MPT) assessment process. Technology and Disability 14, 125–131 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Klaus Miesenberger Joachim Klaus Wolfgang Zagler Arthur Karshmer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Andrich, R., Liverani, G., Pigini, L. (2008). The Risk Factor in the Adaptation of Worksites in ICT-Related Jobs. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5105. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_193

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70540-6_193

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70539-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70540-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Keywords

Publish with us

Policies and ethics